Like many, I received a copy of an online petition seeking to outlaw the annual slaughter of Calderon Dolphins or Pilot Whales in the Faroe Ilands, part of Denmark.

Whales are sensitive, social animals with highly developed nervous systems. They have a profound capacity to suffer distress, terror and pain. Each year, the Faroese kill pilot whales and other small cetaceans.

Calderon0011

Islanders in motorboats first drive the whales into a bay. The chase may be lengthy. The exhausted, terrified and confused whales are eventually driven into the shallows. Here the bloodbath begins. The islanders repeatedly hammer 2.2 kg metal gaffs into the living flesh of each whale until the hooks hold. A 15 cm knife is then used to slash through the blubber and flesh to the spinal column. Next the main blood vessels are severed. The blood-stained bay is soon filled with horribly mutilated and dying whales.

Calderon0012

Every year around 2,000 whales are driven ashore and cruelly slaughtered in the Faroe Islands, mid-way between the Shetland Islands and Iceland. For centuries the Faroe Islanders have hunted pilot whales, driving entire schools into killing bays, where they are speared or gaffed from boats, dragged ashore and butchered with knives. Although the Islands are a protectorate of Denmark, they have their own Government and regulations governing the pilot whale hunt or "grind" as it is known.

Calderon0013

Dolphin drive hunting, also called dolphin drive fishing, is a method of hunting dolphins and occasionally other small cetaceans by driving them together with boats and then usually into a bay or onto a beach.

Calderon0014

Their escape is prevented by closing off the route to the open sea or ocean with boats and nets. Dolphins are hunted this way in several places around the world. In Europe, the biggest annual hunt of this kind takes place in the Faroe Islands in the North Atlantic.

Image0015

Despite the highly controversial nature of the hunt resulting in international criticism, and the possible health risk that the often polluted meat causes, many thousands of dolphins are caught and killed in drive hunts like this each year around the world.  The Faroese celebrate the butchery of their victims in an carnival atmosphere of entertainment. Indoctrinated from an early age, children are often given a day off school to watch the fun. They run down to the bay and clamber over the carcasses of slaughtered whales.

Calderon0016

On the Faroe Islands mainly Pilot Whales are killed by drive hunts for their meat. Though officially this is the only species hunted, other species are also killed on rare occasion such as the Northern bottlenose whale and Atlantic White-sided Dolphin. The hunt is known by the locals as the Grindadráp. There are no fixed hunting seasons, as soon as a pod close enough to land is spotted fishermen set out to begin the hunt. The animals are driven onto the beach with boats, blocking off the way to the ocean.

Calderon0017

 

When on the beach, most of them get stuck. Those that have remained too far in the water are dragged onto the beach by driving a steel hook into the blubber of the animal, though these days in response to allegations of animal cruelty they're more often dragged by putting a hook in their blowhole. When on land, they are killed by cutting down to the major arteries and spinal cord at the neck. The time it takes for a dolphin to die varies from a few seconds to a few minutes, depending on the cut. When the fishermen fail to beach the animals all together, they are let free again.

Calderon0018

The pilot whale stock in the eastern and central North Atlantic is estimated to number 778,000. About a thousand pilot whales are killed this way each year on the Faroe Islands together with usually a few dozen up to a few hundred animals belonging to other small cetaceans species, but numbers vary greatly per year.  The amount of Pilot Whales killed each year is not believed to be a threat to the sustainability of the population, but the brutality of the hunt has resulted in international criticism especially from animal welfare organisations.

Aside from the fact that the number of North Atlantic long-finned pilot whales is unknown and they are listed as 'strictly protected' by the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, this is an act of barbarism and pointlessness. By slaughtering 100 whales at a time, the Faroese are wiping out entire pods and family groups. They are removing building blocks from the gene pool of the species and damaging the web of life in the North Atlantic and the North Sea.

The drive hunt is a practice abandoned elsewhere many decades ago, and now outlawed by other European states. The inhabitants of the Faroe Islands have no subsistence need for whale meat, and much of the flesh is left to rot and be dumped; it cannot be exported, as it is polluted with heavy metals and other toxins and therefore cannot meet EU heath standards for human food.

Calderon0019

As in Japan, here too the meat is contaminated with mercury and cadmium, causing a health risk for those frequently eating it. Again, especially children and pregnant women are at risk.  In November 2008, the New Scientist reported in an article that research done on the Faroe Islands resulted in two chief medical officers recommending against the consumption of Pilot Whale meat, considering it to be too toxic.

In 2008 the local authorities recommended to no longer eat Pilot Whale meat due to the contamination, and this has resulted in reduced consumption, according to a senior Faroese health official.

According to Faroese legislation it is also permitted to hunt certain species of small cetaceans other than pilot whales. These include: Bottlenose dolphin; Atlantic white-beaked dolphin; Atlantic white-sided dolphin; and Harbour porpoise (There are also specific regulations for the hunting of harbour porpoise. Harbour porpoises are killed with shotguns).

So, what am I asking you to do about all this butchery?

Log onto:  this link by clicking here and add your details to the petition to end whale hunting in the Faroe islands.  You can also encourage friends and family to read about this dreadful practice and like you lend their support to abolish this brutality.

There are two guys I know called Thomas Rebel and Bill Child who are involved in a project to:

“permanently obliterate a racist monument on the shores
of the Clyde Estuary on the West coast of Scotland. “

The monument is a rock daubed with red, black and white
paint in the style of a ‘Golliwog’.  The
rock also bears the motto ’Jim Crow’.  The name ‘Jim Crow’ was the nickname given to
the racial segregation laws observed in the US at the beginning of the 20th
Century – the Jim Crow Laws. The name was also applied in the US to the grossly
exaggerated ‘minstrel’ caricature of a black person – that which was was popularly known
in Britain as a ‘Golliwog’.

For many years the racist Jim Crow rock has stood as a testament
to both blatant prejudice and profound ignorance. 

The rock sits on the foreshore of the small community of Dunoon.  In 2003
a letter was published raising the issue and objecting to the rock in the Dunoon
Observer and Argyllshire Standard (the local newspaper), but with little tangible
response. In the same year an email was also written to Trevor Phillips, the head of, the then Commission for
Racial Equality, but received no reply.

Feeling this was unacceptable, the two guys drove to Dunoon last June (2009), and in the dead of night used several tins of Drummond’s
International Grey (an almost perfect colour match for the rock!) and following
closely the instructions on the tins, painted out the motif.

This resulted in the local newspaper taking the issue more
seriously, publishing an article on the ‘vandalism’, and allocating space for
the debate in their letters section. There were several letters of support for the protest from members of the local community. 

DunObArgStan260609

Despite this, within weeks
of the efforts, the motif had been reinstated – most likely with the support of
certain local politicians.

The guys have now pledged to repeat their ‘vandalism’ in order to
achieve the original objective, and will do so again year on year until the
rock is allowed to exist in its’ natural state.

Most recently they have tried to get additional support and endorsement from any other quarters, now including me.  Support I am happy to lend, if it means this nasty afront to diversity might be removed. 

Please find below some interesting links for your perusal.

The following link demonstrates the strength of feeling of a
portion of the local community.
http://www.huntersquay.co.uk/

Another independent website outlining the story.
http://www.secretscotland.org.uk/index.php/Secrets/TheJimCrow

Information provided by the Jim Crow museum details the history and
significance of Jim Crow
http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/what.htm

If you want to assist in maintaining the rock in a neutral (non racist state) by periodically painting it with Drummonds International Grey or if you want to just share your thoughts about the issue, please do so here.

I have had a number of conversations over the past couple of months with British, mostly English people, who reside here in Lanzarote,  about their views of the UK.

Its quite interesting how sheltered I have been to the news from the UK without much time to watch TV or even read a paper in the morning.  I have found myself becoming increasingly out of touch. 

Imagine what happens when someone lives here for a year, five or even ten years.

News is brought by recently landed tourists, debates held in mini-buses or half-caught headlines glanced at as people on sun loungers have a paper by their side.

I remember learning that word fact derives from the Latin 'fac(ere)'- to make, to do.  Similarly words including factor and factory derive from the same source.  Although accepted, these days, as meaning something that has happened, the word fact can just as easily be used to describe something 'made' or 'tested' or 'proved'.  In each one of these cases, simply placing the word man in front of the word dilutes its authority.  ‘Man made’ in regard to a factual piece of information implies it is fiction.  The cynic hearing the term ‘man-tested’, might point out how fallible man is as an authority and anything 'proved' by one man is dimply something waiting to be disproved by another at a later date.

On this basis I have listened and participated in debates with people who have been armed with their facts which they have been fed by news agencies, who were in turn fed by PR companies, spin doctors, politicos and promoters; each with their own bias.  Propaganda therefore fuels the minibus conversations from town to the dive sites most mornings.

As I have listened to debates rage with knickers getting twisted, I have heard details of how in the UK Christmas was banned, the flying of the St George's flag is illegal, the playing of conkers is outlawed and an Englishman is not allowed to be English.

When I was in England, I don't remember it being so restrictive.  I remember Christmas last year and it did not appear to be banned.  I remember distinctly when I received my mail with ‘Merry Christmas’ greetings on it. 

Where I live in Faversham, there is a St George's Day parade.  Is that banned? 

How can conkers be outlawed?  Kids will always find a way of stringing a horse chestnut and trying to hit one against the other.   Won’t they or will the ridiculous ‘elf and safety’ brigade really win the day?

(As a little digression, I remember a chap in my school called Julian having a tiny baby conker in his pocket which he thought was a world record for the 'smallest' – bizarre). 

I suppose this kind of fear-mongering sells papers and plays on peoples deep seated insecurities which in turn divides people and creates prejudice, ultimately selling more newspapers, spreading more lies, half truths or omissions. 

I am left reflecting in how modern Britain is a diverse place with several flags representing not just the geographic identities of England, Wales, Scotland (Northern Ireland which is represented on the Union flag by way of the inclusion of the St Patricks Cross), but many more flags having the possibility of being flown alongside the nations flags, in order to represent the diverse people who live in these places.

The communities I have lived and worked in have been pretty diverse.  Sure, the majority of people in my community have been English, but when the odd flag gets flown, whether any one of the flags already mentioned or indeed Italian, Australian or Ghanaian, I don't internalise it as a threat to my national identity.  I suppose even that I quietly celebrate the fact that the people I am living amongst are not all alike.  Difference in my opinion is good, and instead of worrying about Englishness being 'diluted', I see Englishness adapting and changing as it always has over millennia. 

I am left asking myself "What is an Englishman?".  Since I am English, then my blood is probably a reflection of the language I speak. 

The English language is a cornucopia of words, passed on, stolen or made up over the last 2000 years. English is still evolving, changing and mutating. Our language is not English (whatever that means!) after all – it is a stew pot of diverse words that have travelled to our shores and across our border from all around the globe. So how do words come to be part and parcel of what we use?  The answer is new words come with invaders, migrants, tradesmen; in stories, artworks, technologies and scientific concepts; with those who hold power, and those who try to overthrow the powerful.

So what am I saying?  I suppose I am saying to all those people who probably feel more out of touch than I do, "Untwist your knickers".  Britain is still Britain, England is still England and both will forever be changing.  If your not on the merry-go-round, its hard to keep up. 

For nothing is surer, change or difference happens whatever you do to stop it and so it’s best to celebrate it.  But my point is not just an attempt to say "stop being a bigot".  It is also an attempt to say loud and proud that; I like St George's Day and Christmas and Conkers and anyone trying to ban any of these things are just stupid, and not worthy of any level of serious contemplation.

Now let’s talk about something else.

My smoking experiment seems to be going well and I can now inhale without choking. 

Of late a friends grown-up daughter has been popping round.  Ernest Winehouse' daughter, Susan, has been popping round.  A month or so ago Ernest, a Conservative called my house as asked me on behalf of he and his wife to attend a dinner at their waterside home.

I asked if he was ok, and he was reassuring that he had 'no difficult questions'.

When I arrived I was shown by 'Mother' (a lovely woman) who, on passing an open door from the hall, mentioned that their daughter Susan is cooking.

Then Susan entered my life.

She spoke of far off lands, adventures on beaches with turtle shells, creating pearl jewellery and meeting all kinds of strange and wonderful people.

As it happens Susan is not at all hard on the eye, and has a charisma to bring soul to any dinner of any political persuasion; probably even any dinner, politics excluded.

Susan also had stories!!  Stories of people dying having given their life to explore.  Amazing!

This is not to say that Conservatives are dull, but very often people from the same party in the same Town will share opinions on what is the best way to resolve an issue, notwithstanding their political hue.  This can sometimes result in a lot of dancing around handbags with all parties saying "Your not wrong there" or simply "Yes".  This does not make for a great chat.

I have always found Ernest to be easy to get on with and easy to agree with, but during this dinner, it was special.  He spoke about how he met Mother and how they moved from land to land, before settling where they are now.   Conversation moved across continents and anecdotes were shared.   It was a good evening in fine company.

A week or so later and I was invited to The Sun Inn in West Street by Susan.  It is a really nice pub.  Although a lot of the character was ripped or covered when the antique and retro posters were removed or hidden, it is still the best pub.

This was significant since I had not been their since my mate and I saw my lost love there some months back.

I met Susan who proved herself to be individually an interesting conversationalist.  She was entertaining, lively and witty.  During this time I was called by my old mate and later in the evening, we three met up to continue drinking at home.  It was during this evening that I finally decided to start my social smoking.

Anyhow to cut a long story short, Susan has been around my house several times to help purge it of all its nonsense.  I went out to see my Nan, whilst my sis, Susan and my late dad's wife bagged up and removed 22 bags of stuff which was later taken to the tip.

Over that weekend (last week end) I had an impromptu gathering where I got very, very drunk to the point of oblivion.

I am assured that nothing too outrageous occurred.

At this point its worth pointing out that without the assistance of the three mentioned above, I know that my house would not have been in the condition it was for the people to move in.  

In recognition for her contribution to my home, Susan was rewarded with what she said she wanted the most (…but that is another story).

Susan remains a good pal to whom I am indebted.

Last night I was round a mate’s house, we watched a programme about ‘hoodies’.

It was quite strange in the way it tried to present itself as a serious piece of documentary making and by the end I was not sure if the programme was simply part of the hoody damning media bandwagon or not. 

On reflection I think its producers did a good job trying to look at all the angles and unpicking the presenting problems below the hoody covered surface.

There were two points I found most interesting in the programme.  The first was by a fashion guru who spoke about the 'blandness of youth'; the fact that youth has bought into the corporate machine so much that it is not cutting edge or reactionary as the rockers, mods and punks were, but rather were simply buying 'off the peg' sportswear provided by multi-nationals in every high street around the world.  The hoody is not a statement unless it is simply a statement of mediocre conformity.  This I liked!

NOTE: It is worth mentioning that I have bought a hoodie or two over the past few years thinking that they were a statment against the prejudice targeting those who are normally associated with wearing them.  I even went so far as to wear a hoodie to the first council meeting I attended after being elected a Tory councillor in May 2008, but again that is another story!

The second was when Piers Morgan narrated that (further reiterating his point in an article in the Observer on Sunday 25 September 2005):

"We are CCTV-mad in this country. I discovered in the course of filming this programme that Britain has 20 per cent of the world's CCTV cameras. Yes, 20 per cent. There are more cameras in Basingstoke than in New York City, where they are banned from places like the subway on civil liberty grounds."

"The average Briton will be picked up by 300 cameras a day, creating a pervading sense of paranoia. Cameras don't mug or stab you, though. And there is no doubt that a lot of hoodies cause a lot of problems for those who have the misfortune to live around them."

I thought that I would check out the claim and stumbled upon the following article on BBC News.  I found it interesting and think that everyone should be part of this debate, before its too late. 

Britain is 'surveillance society'
Thursday, 2 November 2006, 15:40 GMT
BBC SOURCE WEBSITE

Fears that the UK would "sleep-walk into a surveillance society" have become a reality, the government's information commissioner has said.

Richard Thomas, who said he raised concerns two years ago, spoke after research found people's actions were increasingly being monitored.

Researchers highlight "dataveillance", the use of credit card, mobile phone and loyalty card information, and CCTV.

Monitoring of work rates, travel and telecommunications is also rising.

There are up to 4.2m CCTV cameras in Britain – about one for every 14 people.

But surveillance ranges from US security agencies monitoring telecommunications traffic passing through Britain, to key stroke information used to gauge work rates and GPS information tracking company vehicles, the Report on the Surveillance Society says.

It predicts that by 2016 shoppers could be scanned as they enter stores, schools could bring in cards allowing parents to monitor what their children eat, and jobs may be refused to applicants who are seen as a health risk.

Produced by a group of academics called the Surveillance Studies Network, the report was presented to the 28th International Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners' Conference in London, hosted by the Information Commissioner's Office.

The office is an independent body established to promote access to official data and to protect personal details.

The report's co-writer Dr David Murakami-Wood told BBC News that, compared to other industrialised Western states, the UK was "the most surveilled country".

"We have more CCTV cameras and we have looser laws on privacy and data protection," he said.

"We really do have a society which is premised both on state secrecy and the state not giving up its supposed right to keep information under control while, at the same time, wanting to know as much as it can about us."

The report coincides with the publication by the human rights group Privacy International of figures that suggest Britain is the worst Western democracy at protecting individual privacy.

The two worst countries in the 36-nation survey are Malaysia and China, and Britain is one of the bottom five with "endemic surveillance".

Mr Thomas called for a debate about the risks if information gathered is wrong or falls into the wrong hands.

"We've got to say where do we want the lines to be drawn? How much do we want to have surveillance changing the nature of society in a democratic nation?" he told the BBC.

"We're not luddites, we're not technophobes, but we are saying not least don't forget the fundamental importance of data protection, which I'm responsible for.

"Sometimes it gets dismissed as something which is rather bureaucratic, it stops you sorting out your granny's electricity bills. People grumble about data protection, but boy is it important in this new age.

"When data protection puts those fundamental safeguards in place, we must make sure that some of these lines are not crossed."

'Balance needed'

The Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) said there needed to be a balance between sharing information responsibly and respecting the citizen's rights.

A spokesman said: "Massive social and technological advances have occurred in the last few decades and will continue in the years to come.

"We must rise to the challenges and seize the opportunities it provides for individual citizens and society as a whole."

Graham Gerrard from the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) said there were safeguards against the abuse of surveillance by officers.

"The police use of surveillance is probably the most regulated of any group in society," he told the BBC.

"Richard Thomas was particularly concerned about unseen, uncontrolled or excessive surveillance. Well, any of the police surveillance that is unseen is in fact controlled and has to be proportionate otherwise it would never get authorised."

With
a recruitment process dedicated to team dynamics, the immediate future
of Actual Reality looks like it’s being carried by its front-line
staff, whilst its board wrestles with the local authority to secure the
castles future.    

In
a dramatic rally of support from over 5000 campaigners using the social
networking website, Facebook the work of a great team of instructors
might have been saved.   Having joined the Facebook campaign and having
engaged in the discussion boards, I was passionate about the cause and
decided that I should ‘do my bit’.

"I was passionate about the cause and decided that I should – do my bit"

It
was one of those spur of the moment decisions that have punctuated my
life over the years.  I decided to take part in a march in support of
the work of the company ‘Actual Reality’, an outdoor education provider
who operates out of a picturesque castle on the West coast of
Scotland.  

 

In
recent months the activities of one of Scotland’s premier outdoor
education centres has been put under threat.   The centre based at
Castle Toward, was closed by the building’s owners, Argyll and Bute
Council in November last year following a combination of both fire
stipulations and overdue maintenance needs not undertaken by the
council.

I
landed in Glasgow on Thursday and was keen to get to grips with the
issues at first hand. It was then that I was introduced to the
dedicated staff of Castle Toward.  Uncertain about their professional
futures, the atmosphere was light and hardworking.     I took
photographs of banners on the castle advertising the forthcoming march
and public meeting.

 

 

The
pressure applied by local community stakeholders together with the
‘Facebook 5000’ did make a difference and at public meeting, the
council made an apparent u-turn.  The council representatives declared
their intent to work alongside Actual Reality to resolve the problems
and re-open the castle on 1st March enabling kids from all over
Scotland to benefit once again.

"the ‘Facebook 5000’ did make a difference"


The
closure threat to the outdoor activity residential education centre has
attracted almost 1,400 signatures on a petition calling for it to stay
open and the council obviously listened. 


In
early January, following the closure and amid heavy criticism of Argyll
and Bute Council for its handling of the situation, local supporters
requested that South Cowal Community Council facilitate a public
meeting to discuss the situation, with council officers in attendance.

Representatives
of Argyll and Bute Council and Actual Reality Learning and Leadership
Ltd had a very positive meeting on 22nd January which cut ‘the Gordian
Knot’.

Following
a gathering of supporters around the bandstand in Dunoon, at a public
meeting on Saturday 30th January, Dr Chris Mason speaking on behalf of
the Directors of Actual Reality explained, “the 1st March opening date
is a great step forward and the company is now engaged in negotiations
with a view of buying the castle and a proportion of the estate from
Argyll and Bute”.

"the 1st March opening date is a great step forward"

Image courtesy of Dunoon Observer and Argyllshire Standard

Whilst
the Facebook campaigners are still gearing up to fight the rest of the
war in support of buying the castle, staff at the castle are fighting
their own battle at the front line leading up to the 1st March. 

In
a push to complete remedial works required in order that Castle Toward
is fully occupied and used for residential accommodation, it’s all
hands on deck, with instructors swapping their paddles and harnesses in
favour of overalls and tools. 

 

The
council released a statement saying, “If the agreed works are completed
to the satisfaction of both parties, Castle Toward will be able to be
used by Actual Reality for the delivery of its outdoor education
programme.”


 

In
an official statement released by Actual Reality it was confirmed
“Castle Toward is a beacon, a bright light on the radar of Scottish
education provision whose contribution to the skills, knowledge,
attitudes and understanding of countless young people is legend.  We
are now all going to work together to carry that capacity forward for
future generations thus helping to develop the confident and
responsible citizens and contributors upon whom so much will depend as
we face more and more complicated options for a sustainable future”.

Pete
“Pedro” Clark, Senior Instructor for Castle Toward, overseeing an
18-strong team of outdoor educators said “It’s fantastic that everyone
has rallied so hard to get the place ready for the kids when they start
coming again.”

"It’s fantastic that everyone has rallied so hard"


Later
during the interview when describing how staff are recruited Pete
explained, “unlike some other centres up and down the country, it’s not
about being macho or testosterone fuelled, it’s not about whether a
person has the best kit or has the most qualifications. It’s about
whether they will fit in and contribute positively to the team.”



Reading
the comments left on the discussion board of the Facebook group, it’s
clear that the team make a big difference to 6000 or so kids who pass
through the centre every year before considering the secondary positive
effects the castle brings to the surrounding local community.   

"my thoughts rest on the Castle Toward instructors and their battle I think they will win"


During
my limited time sitting in the staff room and sharing tea-breaks with
the crew, I left feeling inspired that the castle is in safe hands. 
The front-line instructors are a light hearted and passionate bunch. 
They are the heart-beat of the castle without whom, the castle just
turns into a  Victorian pile of stone and mortar. 

 

As
one member of the ‘Facebook 5000’ and reflecting on my experience
whilst on my flight down to Gatwick, my thoughts rest on the Castle
Toward instructors and their battle I think they will win.   

 

For further information see:

http://www.actualrealitycentres.com

http://www.argyll-bute.gov.uk

Facebook


Forargyll.com

End.