Beyond Self-Interest | Rediscovering Communal Bonds

I dream a world where man
No other man will scorn,
Where love will bless the earth
And peace its paths adorn
I dream a world where all
Will know sweet freedom’s way,
Where greed no longer saps the soul
Nor avarice blights our day.

Langston Hughes

I have attempted to highlight several parallels between the critique of individualism and consumerism within the context of neoliberalism and the principles of Radical Orthodox and Liberation Theology.

Critique of Individualism:

The critique of individualism put forth by radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology goes beyond mere criticism of a prevalent mindset; it delves into the potential consequences and implications of an excessive focus on individualism within society. These perspectives argue that a society that prioritizes personal autonomy and self-interest above all else can harm communal bonds and solidarity.

At the heart of individualism lies the belief that the individual is the primary unit of society and that personal freedom and self-realization should be the ultimate goals. This mindset places a strong emphasis on personal achievement, material success, and the pursuit of one’s own desires and interests. While individualism has positive aspects, such as personal empowerment and the recognition of individual rights, the critique put forth by radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology highlights the potential pitfalls of an extreme individualistic worldview.

One of the key concerns raised by these perspectives is the erosion of communal bonds and social solidarity. When individuals prioritize their own autonomy and self-interest, they may become less inclined to engage in collective action or participate actively in their communities. This can lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and a weakened sense of responsibility towards others. Without a strong sense of community and shared responsibility, addressing social injustices and advocating for the rights of the marginalized becomes much more challenging.

Liberation Theology, in particular, emphasizes the importance of community and collective action in addressing social issues. It recognizes that systemic injustices and marginalization cannot be adequately addressed through individual efforts alone. Instead, it calls for forming communities that work together to confront and challenge oppressive structures and practices. Liberation Theology seeks to empower marginalized groups and promote social transformation by fostering a sense of collective identity and mobilising collective action.

Moreover, the critique of individualism also highlights the potential for inequality and exploitation within a society driven by self-interest. When individuals prioritize their personal gain without considering the well-being of others, it can perpetuate social hierarchies and reinforce systems of oppression. This can marginalise and exploit vulnerable groups, widening the gap between the privileged and the disadvantaged.

In response to these concerns, radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology propose alternative frameworks emphasising community, solidarity, and the common good. They argue for a reevaluation of societal values, where the well-being of all members of society is prioritized over individual success. This reorientation towards the collective involves promoting social justice, advocating for the rights of the marginalized, and fostering a sense of shared responsibility for the common welfare.

Critique of Consumerism:

The critique of consumerism put forth by both radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology challenges the prevailing notion that material accumulation and consumption are the primary measures of well-being. These perspectives argue that an excessive focus on acquiring material possessions neglects important aspects of human flourishing, such as spiritual fulfillment, healthy relationships, and moral values.

Consumerism, as critiqued by these perspectives, promotes a culture of constant desire for material goods and equates personal worth with the ability to acquire and display possessions. It encourages individuals to define their identities and find happiness through the acquisition of the latest products and services. However, radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology contend that this narrow focus on material wealth fails to recognize the deeper needs and aspirations of individuals and communities.

Both perspectives emphasize the spiritual dimension of human existence and the importance of nurturing a meaningful connection with something greater than oneself. They argue that true well-being and fulfillment cannot be attained solely through material possessions, but require the cultivation of spiritual values, such as compassion, gratitude, and a sense of purpose. By prioritizing spiritual growth and seeking meaning beyond material consumption, individuals can develop a more holistic and authentic understanding of well-being.

Moreover, the critique of consumerism also highlights the detrimental effects of this mindset on relationships and social dynamics. When the pursuit of material wealth becomes the primary focus, interpersonal connections can be reduced to transactions and superficial encounters. The value of genuine human interaction, empathy, and communal bonds can be overshadowed by a culture that encourages self-interest and competition.

Liberation Theology, in particular, emphasizes the importance of solidarity and prioritizing the needs of others over material wealth. It challenges the individualistic and self-centered nature of consumerism by advocating for a more compassionate and socially responsible approach to life. This perspective encourages individuals to resist the allure of excessive material accumulation and instead focus on building relationships, caring for the marginalized, and working towards social justice.

By critiquing consumerism, radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology call for reevaluating societal values and priorities. They propose alternative frameworks that emphasize simplicity, moderation and a greater emphasis on the well-being of others. These perspectives highlight the importance of cultivating a culture of sharing, generosity, and responsible stewardship of resources.

The critique of consumerism presented by radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology challenges the notion that material accumulation and consumption are the ultimate measures of well-being. It argues that a narrow focus on material possessions neglects the spiritual, relational, and moral dimensions of human flourishing. By emphasizing values such as simplicity, solidarity, and prioritizing the needs of others, these perspectives promote a more holistic understanding of well-being that goes beyond material wealth and consumption.

Erosion of Communal Bonds:

In examining the erosion of communal bonds and the breakdown of strong communities, there are notable parallels between the critique of individualism and consumerism found within both perspectives and the concerns raised by Radical Orthodox Theology.

Radical Orthodox Theology, like Liberation Theology, emphasizes the significance of strong community ties and the importance of solidarity in creating a more just and equitable society. Both perspectives recognize that communal bonds are essential for fostering a sense of belonging, shared responsibility, and collective well-being. They believe that individualism and consumerism can be detrimental to the health and vitality of communities.

Neoliberal individualism, as critiqued by Radical Orthodox Theology, places a heavy emphasis on personal autonomy and self-interest, often at the expense of communal relationships. This individualistic mindset can result in transactional relationships, where interactions are driven by self-serving motives rather than genuine care and concern for others. It can erode the sense of shared purpose and collective identity crucial for forming strong communities.

Similarly, consumerism, as criticized by Radical Orthodox Theology, promotes a culture of material accumulation and consumption as measures of well-being. This focus on material possessions and materialistic values can lead to a neglect of the spiritual, relational, and moral dimensions of human flourishing. By prioritizing material wealth and possessions, communities may become fragmented, with interpersonal connections becoming shallow and superficial.

In contrast, both Radical Orthodox and Liberation Theology stress the importance of prioritizing strong community ties and solidarity over individualistic and consumeristic pursuits. They advocate for a shift in societal values, placing an emphasis on shared responsibilities, care for the marginalized and the common good. These perspectives challenge the notion that personal fulfilment and happiness can be achieved solely by pursuing self-interest and material wealth, recognizing the need for deeper connections and collective action.

Moreover, both perspectives highlight the detrimental consequences of the erosion of communal bonds. They argue that weakened social connections hinder efforts to address social injustices and promote a more just and equitable society. Without a strong sense of community and solidarity, individuals may be less inclined to engage in collective action or advocate for the rights of the marginalized. This can perpetuate inequality and social divisions.

Focus on the Common Good:

The focus on the common good is a shared emphasis in both Radical Orthodox Theology and the perspectives being discussed. These perspectives recognize that prioritizing individual self-interest, as perpetuated by neoliberal consumerism, can lead to social inequalities and the neglect of marginalized populations. In response, they advocate for reevaluating societal values and promoting social justice to address these issues.

Neoliberal consumerism, driven by the pursuit of personal gain and material accumulation, can exacerbate social inequalities within a society. The unchecked pursuit of individual self-interest often results in a concentration of wealth and power among a privileged few, while marginalizing and neglecting the needs of vulnerable and marginalized populations. This focus on personal gain can perpetuate systemic injustices and contribute to the widening gap between the privileged and the disadvantaged.

Both Radical Orthodox Theology and Liberation Theology challenge this paradigm by highlighting the importance of prioritizing the needs of the poor and marginalized and advocating for social justice. These perspectives assert that the common good should take precedence over individual self-interest. They call for a society that actively works towards greater equity, inclusivity, and solidarity, seeking to challenge the systemic oppression and structures that perpetuate social inequalities.

Liberation Theology, in particular, strongly emphasises addressing the needs of the poor and marginalized as a central component of promoting social justice. It recognizes that systemic oppression and poverty are interconnected and that transformative change requires a deliberate focus on uplifting and empowering marginalized communities. By prioritizing the needs of the poor and advocating for their rights, Liberation Theology seeks to challenge the status quo and create a more just and equitable society.

Similarly, Radical Orthodox Theology shares a concern for the common good and challenges the individualistic mindset that underlies neoliberal consumerism. This perspective argues for a reorientation towards communal values and shared responsibilities that prioritize the well-being of all members of society. It critiques the prioritization of personal gain at the expense of others and emphasizes the importance of social cohesion and solidarity in creating a just society.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the critiques of individualism and consumerism presented by radical orthodox theologians and Liberation Theology converge on recognising the potential negative consequences of these ideologies. They highlight the erosion of communal bonds, weakened social solidarity, the perpetuation of inequality and exploitation, and neglect of human flourishing’s spiritual, relational, and moral dimensions.

Both perspectives advocate for a shift towards community and collective action as essential components in addressing social injustices and promoting a more inclusive and equitable society. They challenge the notion that material accumulation and consumption are the ultimate measures of well-being, emphasizing values such as simplicity, solidarity, and prioritizing the needs of others.

Radical Orthodox Theology and Liberation Theology share common ground in their critique of individualism and consumerism and acknowledge the erosion of communal bonds. They stress the importance of strong community ties and solidarity, highlighting the detrimental effects of neoliberal individualism and consumer culture on relationships and social cohesion. By advocating for shared responsibilities, care for others, and the common good, these perspectives aim to foster strong communal bonds and create a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Ultimately, both Radical Orthodox Theology and Liberation Theology prioritize the common good over individual self-interest. They critique the perpetuation of social inequalities and neoliberal consumerism’s neglect of marginalized populations. By prioritizing the needs of the poor and marginalized, advocating for social justice, and challenging systemic oppression, these perspectives call for reevaluating societal values and a commitment to building a more equitable and inclusive society.

Rooted in Christian metaphysics, they seek to align human values with spiritual principles and promote the flourishing of individuals and communities in harmony with the common good.

Here are some other posts folks have read:

About Rev Lloyd Hobbard-Mitchell

Rev. Lloyd Hobbard-Mitchell, an Englishman deeply connected to Thailand, was ordained to the Sacred Priesthood on 28th May 2023.

In addition to his religious journey, he has worked as an online English teacher and pursued a career as an artist. He has also operated a tour desk business with his wife within international brand hotels.

Lloyd has extensive experience in the voluntary sector, specifically in addressing homelessness and social welfare.

He is a Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society and embraces opportunities to meet new people, see new places, explore cultural similarities, and celebrate differences.

Read More

Combining Radical Orthodox and Liberation Theology into a coherent singular theological approach.

Until now, on my journey of reading theology, I have been most influenced by Liberation Theology.
Recently my friend and colleague Fr. Zach Storey suggested I do a ‘deep dive’ into the works of David Bentley Hart, John Milbank and other Radical Orthodox Christian theologians.
I want to know whether there is a way to coalesce these two pillars of Theology into a coherent singular theological approach.

Would you like to know what I am working on now?

CLICK HERE FOR PATTAYA MISSION
CLICK HERE FOR ST GEORGE’S CHURCH
GIVE HERE TO SUPPORT MY WORK